Canada Launches Open AI-Detection Tool for Courts to Counter Flawed Commercial Solutions

December 5, 2025
Canada Launches Open AI-Detection Tool for Courts to Counter Flawed Commercial Solutions
  • A Canadian project is launching an open, transparent AI-detection tool to help courts assess AI-generated content, addressing flaws in current commercial tools that are opaque, unreliable, biased against non-native English speakers, and prone to false positives.

  • The initiative emphasizes transparency, accuracy, and the provision of confidence levels and explanations for its decisions, moving beyond simple binary flags.

  • The effort targets gaps in court readiness for AI evidence and seeks to be accessible to courts and self-represented litigants across North America, not just Canada.

  • Lead technical work will focus on keeping pace with rapidly evolving AI content, requiring ongoing updates and adaptation.

  • The Canadian Press published the report on December 5, 2025.

  • Funding comes from the Canadian AI Safety Institute, with two inaugural initiatives receiving $700,000 over two years, aligning with Canada's AI safety strategy.

  • The project brings technologists and legal scholars together from Ontario and British Columbia to ensure accessibility for courts and self-represented litigants across North America.

  • An advisory board comprising judges and self-represented litigant support groups guides the project for broad North American adoption.

  • A minimum viable product is anticipated in about two years, with the understanding that ongoing funding and iteration will be necessary beyond the grant period.

  • The team plans to deliver an open-source, free tool designed to help courts detect AI-generated content and distinguish real from manipulated evidence, including images and videos.

  • The project responds to the real-world need for affordable, rapid, and transparent AI-content verification to prevent miscarriages of justice from manipulated media.

  • Crucially, the tool must quantify confidence, provide explanations, and avoid a simplistic verdict to gain judicial trust.

Summary based on 5 sources


Get a daily email with more Tech stories

More Stories