In a Guardian interview, Harrison Ford criticizes Donald Trump’s climate stance as confusing and believes his policies serve the status quo and enrich interests while the world pays the price.

The Guardian piece precedes Ford’s Field Museum conservation award ceremony in Chicago, where he is honored by the E.O. Wilson Biodiversity Foundation.

The recap portrays Trump as rolling back climate protections, halting clean energy projects, promoting fossil fuels, firing scientists, and censoring climate content within government.

Bill Gates argues climate change is serious but not humanity’s demise, calling for addressing climate, disease, and poverty in proportion to the suffering they cause.

Ford remains hopeful that climate action is possible with political will and intellectual sophistication, stressing human adaptability and invention.

He believes society can mitigate climate change by buying time, changing behaviors, and developing new technologies, contingent on political will and smart policy.

Ford envisions collective action and scholarly engagement as essential to enabling humanity to adapt through innovation.

The article includes related tags and concludes with a copyright notice from Nexstar Media Inc.

Ford is portrayed as a longtime environmental advocate who stays vocal about urgent climate action amid political headwinds, with context on global emissions and energy transitions.

The piece notes broader geopolitical tensions and security dynamics, such as Venezuela seeking support and U.S. missile transfers, framing climate in a wider unstable context.

Ford emphasizes Indigenous peoples as stewards of remaining forests and warns that protection in some countries remains fragile.

The discussion situates deforestation, pollution, and other human-caused destruction as key drivers of nature loss.

An ancillary update mentions a Halloween White House post with Trump and Melania distributing candy, not central to the climate narrative.

Ford connects extreme weather events and ongoing emissions to the climate crisis, citing his experience with wildfires near Los Angeles.

He underscores the real-world impact of climate change on individuals and communities through California wildfires and other incidents.

Ford argues that these climate-driven crises, including a record hurricane near Jamaica, illustrate the need for stronger action and accountability.

Ford notes he has warned about climate change for decades and calls for political will, behavior change, new technologies, and policy implementation to buy time.

He argues entrenched interests and the status quo hinder meaningful climate action.

Ford tells The Guardian that public willingness to change behavior and support innovation and policies is essential to mitigating climate change.

Readers are directed to The Guardian’s coverage of Ford’s Field Museum award ceremony for more details.

Ford highlights broader climate impacts like rising wildfire risk and extreme weather, reinforcing the need for political will and innovation.

His climate activism intersects with a political stance that calls for cross-party collaboration to address environmental issues.

Ford has previously endorsed Kamala Harris and criticized Trump in the 2024 election, advocating unity over division.

He stresses his long-standing environmental leadership, including his role with Conservation International since 1991.

Ford rejects a “drill, baby, drill” approach and urges policy implementation, innovation, and political will to confront climate change.

Before the election, Ford’s fictional presidential candidates performed well in polls against Trump and Harris in related surveys.

Gates questions doomsday climate scenarios, advocating a balanced approach to global challenges rather than climate-focused doomism.

Despite criticism, Ford remains cautiously optimistic that cleaner energy and new technologies can prevail with public will and policy shifts away from fossil fuels.

Ford emphasizes decades of climate science and accuses Trump of perpetuating the status quo for personal gain while the world deteriorates.

The article notes that a second-term Trump administration could withdraw from the Paris Agreement, pressure others to weaken climate rules, and remove scientists from government channels.