Over the past decade, Canada has approved more than 17,600 individuals with criminal records to enter the country, highlighting a significant shift towards more inclusive immigration practices.

This trend reflects changing attitudes in immigration policy, moving away from strict exclusionary measures.

The decision to grant entry has sparked discussions among policymakers and advocates regarding the implications for public safety and the rights of individuals with criminal pasts.

These approvals are part of a broader effort to balance public safety concerns with the rehabilitation and reintegration of former offenders into society.

The Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) emphasizes that the approval process is not about forgiving crimes but ensuring that applicants meet specific legal and safety standards.

The process allows foreign nationals with past convictions to demonstrate rehabilitation and show they do not pose a threat to Canadian society, as outlined in the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.

Each application is assessed individually, considering factors such as the nature of the offense, the time elapsed since the offense, conduct since then, and community support.

To qualify for entry, applicants must have completed their sentence and waited at least five years, proving they have changed since their offense.

Chantal Desloges, an immigration lawyer, points out that even minor offenses, like driving under the influence, can lead to inadmissibility in Canada, contrasting with the U.S. approach.

Although IRCC does not categorize approvals by crime type or country of origin, many offenses leading to approvals are relatively minor.

From 2014 to 2024, Canada received over 25,350 rehabilitation applications, with approximately 70% approved, 20% denied, and 10% withdrawn.

Continued assessments and evaluations of this policy are anticipated as Canada navigates its immigration landscape amidst evolving societal views.