The Trump administration is withdrawing $12.3 million in federal education funding from California, citing the state's refusal to remove 'radical gender ideology' from sex education materials, specifically content discussing gender identity beyond the male-female binary.

This funding cut is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to restrict gender-related policies, including limiting gender-affirming care and education, amid ongoing culture war debates.

California has the right to appeal the decision within thirty days, according to the Department of Health and Human Services.

California officials maintain their curriculum is medically accurate, legally compliant, and already approved by federal agencies, refusing to alter it despite accusations from the HHS that it promotes misinformation and potentially encourages gender mutilation.

The American Academy of Pediatrics criticized the HHS report, asserting it misrepresents medical consensus on gender dysphoria treatment for minors.

The federal funds in question support programs for nearly 13,000 youths annually across various agencies, including juvenile justice, homeless shelters, foster care, and schools.

The disputed grant is part of a nationwide program providing over $18 million to California over three years for adolescent education on abstinence and contraception.

Advocates warn that defunding California could harm LGBTQ+ youth, who already face higher risks of bullying and suicide, emphasizing that inclusive education can reduce stigma and save lives.

Federal officials criticized California for including content about transgender and gender non-conforming identities, claiming it exceeds the scope of the grant, while California argues its materials are medically accurate and approved.

California has responded by creating separate categories in sports for transgender athletes but refuses to modify its educational materials, challenging federal authority.

Experts and advocates view this move as an unprecedented misuse of federal power to influence educational content, particularly targeting LGBTQ+ inclusive education.

The controversy highlights ongoing conflicts over federal influence in local education, especially regarding LGBTQ+ issues, with legal battles over grant cancellations and authority.