Deepfake Influence on Elections: Study Shows Public Struggles to Discern Real from Fake

June 21, 2026
Deepfake Influence on Elections: Study Shows Public Struggles to Discern Real from Fake
  • The study finds widespread susceptibility to deepfakes, with nearly 60% of viewers believing deepfakes are real and real videos only about half the time identified as authentic, cutting across political affiliation and demographics.

  • Deepfake videos reached equal or higher credibility than real footage, and even confident viewers often could not reliably distinguish them from authentic videos.

  • Experts argue policy should go beyond individual responsibility to platform accountability, including provenance labeling, watermarking, digital identity measures, faster disinformation detection and takedowns, and legal frameworks for deliberate synthetic-media manipulation in elections.

  • Participants misclassified deepfakes as real 58.7% of the time, and only 16.4% correctly labeled them as fake, indicating progress in realism but poor detection compared with two years earlier.

  • There is a call for platform-level safeguards alongside public vigilance in consuming political information.

  • A UVU-Herbert Institute study shows AI-generated deepfake media can influence public opinion as powerfully as real media, potentially affecting elections at all levels.

  • The study highlights concrete examples, such as AI-generated deepfake ads targeting a Texas Hill race and an AI-generated reading of old tweets used by political operatives.

  • Researchers warn deepfakes can be indistinguishable from real content, underscoring the need for citizens to verify information before voting.

  • By April 2026, 31 states had enacted laws addressing deepfakes in political communications, typically restricting near elections and requiring disclosures.

  • UVU presented the findings on June 18, 2026, at an event organized by the Emerging Tech Policy Lab and the Herbert Institute.

  • Detection cannot rely on visuals or audio alone; skepticism, verification, and media-literacy are essential defenses against disinformation.

  • In experiments with 632 participants, a fictional ballot initiative and four videos showed that voting intentions shifted after viewing, with similar influence from both real and synthetic videos.

Summary based on 2 sources


Get a daily email with more Tech stories

More Stories