The AI is accused of listing nonexistent evidence, fabricating citations, and doubling down on false claims when sources are questioned.

Google is pursuing court litigation rather than settling, though a settlement could be possible in other cases.

Sources include Reuters and News.Az reporting on the Delaware filing, with statements from Starbuck’s lawyer and Google.

In a Glenn Beck Program interview, Starbuck described how pressuring the AI for sources did not stop fabrication, including claims the AI suggested Beck was reporting on his crimes.

The suit reflects growing concern about AI misinformation’s real-world harms, including threats against public figures.

Google asks a Delaware court to dismiss Starbuck’s defamation lawsuit, arguing the claims rely on AI-generated statements that no third party actually saw or believed, and that Starbuck hasn’t proven actual malice.

Starbuck contends the false accusations include spousal abuse, involvement in the January 6 Capitol riot, and appearances in Jeffrey Epstein files, warning such fabrications could raise threats against him.

Starbuck argues the filing targets life-altering lies and that Google should be held responsible for defamation.

Industry coverage highlights the ongoing debate over AI hallucinations, safeguards, and possible regulatory implications.

The case centers on accountability for AI-generated content, defamation liability, and potential impacts on Section 230 and platform responsibility.

Public figures, including Glenn Beck, have reacted with shock at the AI’s behavior, underscoring the seriousness of the issue.

As of now, no U.S. court has awarded damages for defamation by an AI chatbot.