The Delhi High Court rejected ANI’s request for interim relief, ruling that OpenAI’s storage and use of ANI’s copyrighted news content to train ChatGPT’s models appears prima facie protected under the fair dealing exception and does not constitute infringement at this stage.

ANI had alleged unauthorized use of its reports and the risk that ChatGPT could generate pieces with invented quotes attributed to ANI, potentially harming its image and fueling misinformation.

Summons in the suit were issued in November 2024, marking what’s described as the first India-based lawsuit against ChatGPT.

This is a developing story with further updates expected.

The coverage places the case within ET’s tech/AI section as part of a broader tech-news roundup, underscoring its industry significance.

Observers note the legal landscape around AI training and outputs is unsettled and evolving, with potential for appeals and differing outcomes across jurisdictions.

The dispute raises broader questions about ownership of knowledge and culture in the AI era, balancing innovation with creator rights and the economics of content for AI platforms.

Several media and publishing organizations are parties to the case, reflecting publishing coalitions’ stake in AI training debates.

A full judgment on the merits is pending; the interim order confirms jurisdiction but leaves open the broader questions of fair dealing and AI training legality.

The main suit will continue in the Delhi High Court, with the final ruling potentially influencing the AI-publisher relationship in India.

Amid ongoing proceedings, the outcome could shape licensing strategies, data practices, and the balance between innovation and rights in the Indian AI ecosystem.

[No additional information provided in the source for this point.]