Both headsets are powered by Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 processors, with the Pico 4 Ultra having more RAM (12GB vs. 8GB), but software optimization favors the Quest 3, resulting in comparable performance.

The Quest 3 boasts a larger and more accessible library of software titles, in contrast to the Pico 4 Ultra's limited, region-locked catalog.

While display resolution is comparable, the Quest 3 offers better color accuracy and a higher refresh rate of up to 120Hz, whereas the Pico 4 Ultra has superior passthrough cameras for mixed reality applications.

Both the Pico 4 Ultra and Meta Quest 3 support SteamVR for PC VR connectivity, but the Pico 4 Ultra offers more RAM and potentially better multitasking, while the Quest 3 provides easier setup and better support.

Battery life for both headsets is similar, lasting around 2 to 3 hours during active use, with approximately 2.5 hours needed to recharge, resulting in a tie.

The Quest 3 controllers feature superior haptic feedback and hand-tracking capabilities, making them better for precise control.

Overall, the Meta Quest 3 is the recommended choice due to its user-friendly experience, larger software ecosystem, better controllers, and competitive price, maintaining its position as the leading VR headset.

Ergonomically, the Pico 4 Ultra is lighter and more comfortable due to better weight distribution and adjustable straps, making it preferable for extended wear.

In terms of availability and pricing, the Quest 3 is more accessible in the U.S., with easier purchase options and warranty support, whereas the Pico 4 Ultra is mainly available through imports and is more expensive without U.S. support.