Albanese emphasized that US lawmakers he met have shown 'universal' support for the defence ties between Australia and the US, reinforcing his confidence in the relationship, even as a contentious 10 percent trade tariff imposed by the US on Australian goods looms over the election.

Dutton's energetic performance included identifying China's Communist Party as Australia's greatest security threat, although he stumbled on estimating the price of eggs, which he quoted at $4.20 instead of the actual $8.

On climate change, Albanese supports a transition towards decarbonisation, while Dutton promotes a US$200 billion plan to develop nuclear power through seven new reactors, showcasing their divergent strategies.

The debate also revealed both leaders' avoidance of significant issues like national security and economic growth, often resorting to repetitive talking points and personal jabs.

Analysts viewed the debate as a draw overall, with some suggesting Dutton had a slight edge due to his assertive delivery and focus on economic issues.

Albanese acknowledged China's significant role as a major power and trading partner, while emphasizing the need for Australia to invest in its defence capabilities.

Both leaders engaged in a trivial exchange about Trump's mobile phone number, failing to provide substantial answers to pressing questions, which further frustrated viewers.

As the Australian federal election approaches on May 3, 2025, the high cost of living remains the primary concern for voters.

In the final debate held on April 27, 2025, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton surprisingly expressed trust in US President Donald Trump regarding the defence relationship between Australia and the US, despite public skepticism.

A recent Resolve Political Monitor revealed that 68% of Australians believe Trump's election has been detrimental to Australia, reflecting a decline in trust towards the US, with only 36% expressing confidence in the country.

The debate format, which included a strict 60-second time limit on responses and a dramatic musical backdrop, led to a lack of substantial discourse between the candidates.

During the debate, both leaders discussed economic policies, with Albanese proposing permanent tax cuts while Dutton advocated for temporary reductions on gasoline and diesel, highlighting their differing approaches to the cost of living.