A controversial governance proposal at World Liberty Financial aims to unlock and vest 62.28 billion WLFI tokens over multi-year schedules, triggering a sell‑off amid two cohorts: 17.04 billion for early supporters with a two-year cliff followed by two-year linear vesting (fully distributed by year four), and 45.24 billion for founders, team, advisors, and partners under a stricter plan including a 10% burn, a two-year cliff, three-year linear vesting, and full distribution by year five.

WLFI’s price has plunged about 88% from its September 2025 peak, hitting an all‑time low near $0.059 on the eve of the vote, with potential downside if the price drifts toward $0.05 or lower.

The vote has opened on a proposal to unlock 62 billion WLFI tokens, which would begin circulating after the two-year cliff if approved.

The unfolding governance drama includes high-profile associations with the Trump family and advocates, prompting concern from lawmakers about the venture and related deals.

Bitcoin rose roughly 1.4% to around $76,200 in the same period, with neutral retail sentiment and typical BTC chatter noted as context for market mood.

Public critiques on X (formerly Twitter) labeled the move coercive and reminiscent of a rug pull, with prominent voices including Simon Dedic and Justin Sun voicing strong disapproval.

The discourse frames the plan as potentially governance manipulation, raising concerns about consolidation of voting power among top wallets and the risk of punishing dissent.

Some critics describe the governance reshaping as a possible governance scam, noting top wallets’ influence and questioning whether structured vesting will restore confidence or deepen skepticism depending on execution.

The episode underscores ongoing debates over governance transparency within WLFI, weighing community governance against centralized influence.

Technical signals show mixed near-term momentum: Parabolic SAR indicates resistance above the price at about $0.078, while RSI suggests the asset is deeply oversold and could rebound soon.

The article draws on a CCN report by Abiodun Oladokun and frames the situation with on-chain and technical context, while avoiding financial advice.

Critics describe the proposal as potentially rug-pull‑like; questions about timing come from figures like Moonrock Capital’s Simon Dedic and Tron founder Justin Sun, who criticized it as absurd.