The author argues that the Ted Lindsay Award should be considered the NHL's MVP of record, while the Hart Trophy should remain but not be the top honor.

Rising stars like Macklin Celebrini could affect Hart eligibility and, in turn, the value proposition of each award.

Definition differences are highlighted: the Hart honors the most valuable to the team, while the Lindsay recognizes the most outstanding player.

There is a concluding sense that this is a thought-provoking discussion about traditions, narratives, and the purpose of MVP recognition in the league.

The debate is framed as a matter of hearts and minds, noting the NHL Awards page ranking and hockey storytelling culture.

Current top contenders (McDavid, Kucherov, MacKinnon) are cited, with emphasis on how team success influences value to the team.

Voter bases differ: Hart is chosen by the Professional Hockey Writers Association, Lindsay by the NHL Players' Association, with the author favoring players' perspectives.

Historically, the Hart Trophy has existed since 1924 and the Ted Lindsay Award since 1971, and inertia makes change unlikely.

Trophy design is noted, with the Hart being more grandiose and the Lindsay featuring Ted Lindsay himself.