All eight investigations were archived, some without any diligências, and Rosa contends at least one alleged corruption inquiry against him was also shelved.

The letter criticizes the MP’s conduct as illegal and an attack on the judiciary and democracy, urging defenders of the rule of law to respond appropriately.

Reporting notes that the detailed content is behind a paywall, but the piece centers on Rosa’s defense and perceived retaliation by authorities.

Rosa asserts there can be no unchecked powers infringing fundamental rights and calls for scrutiny and accountability of investigative methods used by the MP to safeguard the rule of law and democracy.

Judge Ivo Rosa sent a letter to the Portuguese President alleging that the Public Prosecutor’s Office opened eight inquiries into his judicial decisions—focused mainly on the Marquês Operation and Octapharma cases—with the aim of pursuing, defaming, and constraining him.

Rosa argues the investigations violate the rule of law and threaten judicial independence, framing them as an attack on democracy and calling for defenders of the rule of law to respond.

He says the alleged persecution concerns the rule of law and should be discussed by political leaders to prevent recurrence, asserting the implications reach beyond him.

Rosa notes impediments to full access to inquiries and metadata, arguing that denying scrutiny of investigative methods breaches the right to effective judicial protection.

The case’s exposure extends to the Portuguese President, the President of the Assembly, and the Ombudsman, signaling a broad political-legal impact.

Overall, the narrative frames a confrontation between the judiciary and the Public Prosecutor’s Office, with Rosa insisting on independence and accountability.

Rosa references a 1,000-euro payment mentioned in a wiretap, noting the MP highlighted it six months after the fact to drive an investigation following his pivotal Marquês ruling.

Rosa details that the Octapharma inquiry accessed call records and metadata of 98 contacts, including judges, and sought banking and income details, raising privacy and rights concerns.