Expert opinion evidence handling in Australian courts is in crisis.

Concerns about the reliability of forensic science are raising fears of wrongful convictions.

Courts are criticized for admitting 'junk science' without proper validation.

Flawed methods, such as fingerprint comparisons and bite mark analysis, are particularly problematic.

Experts are calling for an explicit reliability standard for expert evidence.

There is a push to establish an independent panel for scientific guidance.

The creation of a Criminal Cases Review Commission is recommended to investigate potential wrongful convictions.

Urgent reform is needed to ensure the accuracy and fairness of the criminal justice system.

Focus should be on understanding the limitations of forensic science and not blindly accepting expert evidence.