The United Nations is planning to reduce its global peacekeeping force by 25%, evacuating approximately 13,000 to 14,000 personnel from nine missions worldwide due to funding cuts primarily driven by the United States, the largest donor.

This decision reflects ongoing financial constraints, with the U.S. contributing a reduced $680 million and China pledging to meet its full share by year's end, collectively covering half of the UN peacekeeping budget.

The troop reductions are expected to significantly impact peace and security efforts, especially in volatile regions like South Sudan, where peacekeepers play a critical role.

Experts warn that these cutbacks could undermine the effectiveness and credibility of UN peacekeeping operations, raising concerns about the organization’s ability to maintain stability in conflict zones.

Amid these financial challenges, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres is actively seeking ways to improve efficiency and cut costs, especially as the organization approaches its 80th anniversary.

Guterres and UN leadership are exploring measures to reduce expenses, including a proposed 15% budget cut for 2026, to address the ongoing financial crisis.

The Secretary-General defends peacekeeping as a cost-effective tool for international security, highlighting that it accounts for less than one percent of global military spending, despite the budget cuts.

The decision to cut peacekeeping forces comes amid broader discussions on the sustainability and funding of international peace and security initiatives.

Officials acknowledge that these troop reductions could have serious consequences on peace and security, although the full impact remains uncertain.

Uncertainty over future U.S. funding continues to influence the UN’s financial planning, with the current cuts driven by a lack of funds and shifting priorities.

The troop reductions could potentially weaken the operational effectiveness of UN peacekeeping missions and diminish their global reach.