A federal judge in Washington, D.C. temporarily blocked ICE from enforcing seven-day advance notice requirements for visiting immigration detention facilities by members of Congress.

The case unfolds amid ongoing political tensions, with Democrats highlighting oversight concerns and actions against ICE facilities, including protests and arrests by officials.

The ruling suggests observations by lawmakers are important for oversight of ICE detention operations, particularly during enforcement surges.

ICE and DHS contend the policy is necessary for operational security and safety, while still allowing structured congressional oversight.

The ruling raises broader questions about the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch, with the government signaling an appeal.

The lawsuit contends the notice policy obstructs congressional oversight amid a nationwide surge in immigration enforcement, while the judge noted the importance of access to conditions and operations.

Judge Cobb underscored lawmakers’ legitimate interest in observing facility conditions, staff conduct, and the whereabouts of constituents or their families to fulfill oversight responsibilities.

The case sits within a wider political context, including presidential emphasis on immigration enforcement.

The decision highlights that timely access is necessary for accountability and transparency regarding treatment and conditions inside ICE facilities.

Plaintiffs span multiple states—California, Colorado, Maryland, Mississippi, New York, and Texas—demonstrating broad congressional interest in detention conditions.

Lawmakers argue that unannounced inspections are essential for monitoring detention conditions and enforcement practices, and contend the restrictions violate separation of powers and statutes protecting oversight.

The report notes prior incidents where Democratic officials faced arrest or legal action related to protests or unannounced visits to ICE facilities, including a May arrest in Newark.