US Copyright Office Clarifies AI's Role in Creative Works: Human Input Essential for Protection

February 18, 2025
US Copyright Office Clarifies AI's Role in Creative Works: Human Input Essential for Protection
  • In January 2025, the United States Copyright Office (USCO) released significant guidelines addressing the intersection of copyright and Artificial Intelligence (AI).

  • When registering AI-assisted works, creators must clearly differentiate their contributions from those generated by AI, especially if the AI's involvement exceeds a minimal threshold.

  • Both Canadian and US laws require works to be original, with Canadian law placing emphasis on skill and judgment, while US law mandates independent creation and minimal creativity.

  • Jackson Pollock's paintings serve as a benchmark to illustrate the significance of human touch in art, contrasting them with AI-generated works that rely heavily on algorithms and user prompts.

  • These guidelines clarify that copyright protection is reserved exclusively for human authors, stating that works generated entirely by AI are not eligible for such protection.

  • The USCO emphasizes the necessity of human involvement in creative works, advocating for AI to serve as an assistive tool rather than a complete replacement for human creativity.

  • The USCO will evaluate copyright claims on a case-by-case basis to determine the necessary level of human contribution for protection, with courts expected to provide further guidance.

  • Copyright issues surrounding AI art remain unresolved in Canada, where courts have yet to define whether an AI can be considered an 'author.'

  • If an author's creative input is evident in AI-generated work, it may qualify for copyright protection, although the AI-generated portions alone will not be protected.

  • The USCO has recognized the copyrightable work 'Rose Enigma' for incorporating human elements, contrasting it with the rejected work 'Suryast' that lacked clear human input.

  • The rise of generative AI models raises concerns about diminishing human authorship, which could impact copyright claims.

  • Parameters, known as 'seed' values', can help limit randomness in AI outputs and bolster claims of originality, although they have not yet led to successful copyright registrations.

Summary based on 7 sources


Get a daily email with more AI stories

Sources


Practical commentary for protecting generative AI art

Norton Rose Fulbright logo • Feb 18, 2025

Practical commentary for protecting generative AI art

Practical commentary for protecting generative AI art

Norton Rose Fulbright logo • Feb 18, 2025

Practical commentary for protecting generative AI art

Practical commentary for protecting generative AI art

Norton Rose Fulbright logo • Feb 18, 2025

Practical commentary for protecting generative AI art

More Stories