The court heard that a meeting on December 20, 2023, involving key ABC executives, focused on Lattouf's non-compliance with social media guidelines, which ultimately led to her removal.

Lattouf's legal team argues that no formal directive was given to her, citing testimony from her line manager, who only advised against controversial postings.

The ABC's barrister contended that holding personal opinions does not equate to being an activist, asserting that employers can request employees refrain from sharing political views at work.

ABC's legal team argued that Lattouf's removal was protective rather than discriminatory, emphasizing that she was relieved of her responsibilities rather than being sacked.

The ABC maintains that Lattouf's contract ended as scheduled and that she was not terminated but simply not required to work her last two shifts.

Justice Darryl Rangiah is tasked with determining whether Lattouf was unlawfully dismissed and if her political opinion and ethnic background influenced that decision.

Lattouf claims that her ongoing legal battle reveals systemic racism within the ABC organization.

She was removed from her position as a casual fill-in presenter shortly after posting a critical comment about Israel on social media, which allegedly breached a directive regarding political posts.

If the ABC loses the case, they have proposed a modest payout to Lattouf, acknowledging that her termination contributed to her psychological distress.

Lattouf stated that she has achieved her goal of exposing the ABC's issues, leaving the outcome of the case in the court's hands.

Lattouf seeks compensation, penalties, and reinstatement, asserting that her removal violated the Fair Work Act and the ABC's own policies.

Antoinette Lattouf is currently engaged in an unlawful termination case against the ABC, alleging that her dismissal was influenced by her political opinions and race.