Opposition Leader Peter Dutton is considering a referendum to amend the constitution, which would allow for the deportation of dual nationals convicted of certain serious crimes.

Dutton has criticized Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for dismissing this referendum idea, arguing that it is essential to strip citizenship from individuals guilty of severe offenses such as child sexual abuse.

In response, Labor has accused Dutton of using the referendum as a distraction from his party's economic policies, which have come under scrutiny.

Historically, the 1951 referendum aimed at countering a High Court ruling was narrowly defeated, reflecting public skepticism towards political motives and a strong respect for the judiciary.

Labor has already expressed its opposition to the proposed referendum, indicating that it lacks the bipartisan support necessary for success, as evidenced by recent referendum failures.

While Shadow Attorney-General Michaelia Cash stated that the Coalition currently has no immediate plans for a referendum, she acknowledged that it could be considered as a last resort for constitutional amendments.

Public sentiment appears to be fatigued with referendums, particularly in light of the ongoing cost-of-living crisis, raising concerns about the viability of spending $450 million on this proposal.

Dutton has emphasized community safety, arguing that legislative measures alone are insufficient, and that constitutional changes are necessary to enhance protections.

Critics warn that the proposed constitutional change could exacerbate societal divisions, echoing past fears related to racial reclassification.

Dutton's proposal follows a 2022 High Court ruling that determined only judges, not ministers, have the authority to strip citizenship, indicating a constitutional amendment may be required.

Constitutional law experts have raised concerns that the referendum could undermine the separation of powers, potentially allowing ministers to wield judicial-like powers over citizenship matters.

Albanese has dismissed Dutton's proposal as a transient 'thought bubble' that diverts attention from pressing economic issues, criticizing its lack of substance.