The government is currently reviewing responses to its consultation and plans to release a report assessing the economic impact of the proposed changes.

As the government conducts consultations on copyright proposals, opponents are leveraging the data bill to express their discontent.

However, Starmer's government has shown hesitance towards the amendment, opting for continued consultations instead.

Critics have highlighted the government's resistance to supporting transparency requirements, raising doubts about its effectiveness in preventing copyright violations.

Technology Secretary Peter Kyle is exploring a new licensing system for copyright holders and AI developers, moving away from the previously favored 'opt-out' proposal.

A recent letter has urged the UK government to update copyright laws to protect artists from the implications of artificial intelligence (AI).

The amendment, championed by Beeban Kidron, garnered significant support, passing with 272 votes in favor compared to 125 against.

Notable signatories of the letter include artists like Elton John, Paul McCartney, and Florence Welch, underscoring widespread concern within the creative sector.

The Department of Science, Innovation and Technology has stated it will consult on measures that balance the interests of creators and tech companies, though some peers argue immediate action is necessary.

Critics argue that the government's approach prioritizes technological advancement over the rights of artists and creators, raising concerns about ownership of their work.

Public interest in copyright and AI issues is significant, with over 11,500 submissions received for the ongoing government consultation.

As the vote on Kidron's amendment approaches, the creative community remains vigilant in protecting their rights while navigating the landscape of technological innovation.