Supporters of Read celebrated outside the courthouse as the verdict was announced, underscoring the emotional stakes involved.

This second trial differed significantly from the first, which ended in a mistrial due to issues with the lead investigator's conduct.

Legal analysts noted that the retrial featured a more vigorous defense strategy, focusing on police misconduct and inconsistencies in the prosecution's case.

After 30 days of testimony, the jury deliberated for about 20 hours, reflecting the complexity and public interest surrounding the case.

The trial has highlighted broader issues of accountability and justice within the legal system, particularly in cases involving law enforcement personnel.

O'Keefe's family has filed a wrongful-death lawsuit against Read and two bars where the couple drank on the night of the incident, further complicating the aftermath of the case.

The case of Karen Read, accused in the death of police officer John O'Keefe, has attracted significant media attention due to the nature of the charges and her relationship with the victim.

On June 18, 2025, a jury acquitted Read of second-degree murder but convicted her of operating a motor vehicle under the influence, leading to a sentence of one year of probation.

Despite the conviction for drunk driving, the jury's decision to clear her of the more serious charge reflects the complexities of the case.

Read expressed her determination for justice for O'Keefe, stating, 'No one has fought harder for justice for John O’Keefe than I have,' while her supporters alleged police corruption.

During the trial, Read maintained her innocence, arguing that O'Keefe's injuries resulted from a fight inside a house rather than being struck by her vehicle.

The trial was marked by allegations of a 'blue wall of silence' among police officers and claims that key suspects were not adequately investigated.