The Prime Minister's office contends that the government's modelling does not fully capture the situation, citing additional funding aimed at helping individuals with disabilities and health conditions enter the workforce.

The rise in mental health issues since the COVID-19 pandemic has been identified as a contributing factor to increasing social costs, complicating the welfare reform landscape.

Starmer has acknowledged his leadership missteps, admitting he was too focused on international issues while neglecting domestic unrest regarding welfare reforms.

Kendall acknowledged that the benefit cuts would save only £2.5 billion, significantly less than the previously stated £4.8 billion, raising further questions about the government's fiscal strategy.

Internal criticism of Starmer's government is accompanied by a shift in voter support towards parties like the Greens and Liberal Democrats, as well as the far-right Reform UK party.

Despite initial optimism, the government's position has weakened as MPs criticized the clarity of the concessions, leading to fears of a potential three-tier welfare system.

A 'reasoned amendment' proposed by Dame Meg Hillier, which could have halted the legislation, was initially signed by 126 Labour MPs, but the rebellion was temporarily averted after concessions were deemed a 'workable compromise.'

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer is facing a significant parliamentary revolt over proposed welfare cuts, which are expected to push 150,000 people into poverty by 2030, as MPs prepare to vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Bill.

Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall defended the government's approach, arguing that the reforms are necessary for future sustainability and fairness for both beneficiaries and taxpayers.

Criticism has emerged from Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey, who argue that the reforms do not adequately address the rising benefits bill.

Furious Labour rebels and protests from disabled activists have condemned the government's welfare plans, claiming they create a 'two-tier' system and that the concessions offered are insufficient.

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds defended the government's reforms, asserting their necessity for improving the welfare system, despite acknowledging existing significant issues.