Justice Brett Kavanaugh noted that while the law is likely unconstitutional, the court chose not to block it during the legal process, emphasizing the emergency nature of the case.

The Supreme Court's decision was made without dissent and did not specify its reasoning, with Kavanaugh highlighting that the law might be unconstitutional but that the plaintiffs had not demonstrated sufficient harm.

The law imposes penalties of $10,000 per violation and potential criminal charges; a lower court initially blocked it, but the appeals court allowed it to take effect while its constitutionality is challenged.

Major social media platforms, represented by groups like NetChoice, argue the law infringes on First Amendment rights and could hinder free speech, especially for vulnerable groups like LGBTQ+ youth.

NetChoice, which includes companies like Google, Meta, and Snap, filed an emergency appeal to prevent enforcement, asserting the law violates privacy rights and free speech.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation criticized the Mississippi law as well-intentioned but fundamentally flawed, raising privacy concerns.

Mississippi officials justify the law as a response to online crimes such as sextortion, citing a case where a teen died by suicide after being targeted online, and emphasizing the law's role in protecting minors.

The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily allowed Mississippi to enforce a law requiring social media companies to verify user ages and obtain parental consent for minors, aiming to protect children from online dangers.

This decision follows ongoing legal battles in several states, including Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Ohio, and Utah, where similar laws are being challenged.

Supporters argue these laws are necessary to mitigate social media's negative impact on youth, while opponents raise concerns about privacy and free speech.

This case follows a recent Supreme Court decision upholding a Texas law requiring age verification for sexually explicit content, emphasizing the importance of protecting children online.

The legal process continues, with the Supreme Court's decision setting the stage for lower courts to rule on the law's constitutionality, amid ongoing debates over free speech and online safety.