The Court is also examining cases involving voting rights, notably Louisiana's redistricting plan, which could challenge the creation of majority-Black districts and impact the enforcement of the Voting Rights Act.

Among the high-profile cases under review are those related to agency independence, such as the possible overturning of Humphrey's Executor v. US, which limits the president's ability to remove heads of independent agencies.

Cases concerning social issues include a challenge to the Obergefell v. Hodges decision on same-sex marriage, and a case involving Kim Davis, who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, raising questions about the future of marriage equality.

The Feres Doctrine, which prevents service members from suing the government for injuries incurred incident to military service, is under review, with critics arguing it should be overruled to allow more litigation, especially in a case involving the family of a killed Air Force staff sergeant.

This review could challenge the longstanding immunity provided by the Feres Doctrine, which bars service members' families from suing the government for injuries related to military service.

Overall, the conservative majority on the Supreme Court has shown a willingness to revisit and overturn key precedents, signaling potential major shifts in legal interpretations across social, political, and constitutional issues.

These cases suggest a broader trend where the Court might revise or overturn decisions that have shaped American law for decades, impacting civil rights, religious liberties, and government authority.

The U.S. Supreme Court is preparing to review several landmark cases in its upcoming term, with potential to overturn decades-old precedents across a broad spectrum of issues including civil rights, campaign finance, religious expression, and administrative law.

Legal challenges to campaign finance laws are also on the docket, including a case that could remove restrictions on party spending and coordination with candidates, potentially reshaping political funding.

The Court is considering whether to revisit a 1995 decision that barred prayer over public address systems at high school football games, which could lead to broader acceptance of religious expressions in public schools.