Lise Klaveness argues that FIFA’s peace prize falls outside the federation’s mandate, warning that peace prizes are inherently political and require independent juries and criteria that FIFA does not provide.

She notes FIFA’s inaugural prize to Donald Trump in December was seen by many as a consolation for his Nobel Prize comments, signaling controversy around the award.

Klaveness cautions that involving FIFA in political awards risks compromising federations’ distance from state leaders and could politicize football.

FairSquare filed an official complaint with FIFA’s Ethics Committee shortly after the prize was awarded, and the Norwegian association has since supported them.

Klaveness calls for checks and balances, transparent timelines, and clear reasoning in any conclusions about the prize awarding.

The NFF board plans to back calls for an investigation into FIFA’s prize decision, aligning with FairSquare’s allegations of potential ethical breaches by Infantino and FIFA.

FairSquare raises concerns about political bias in FIFA’s prize, pushing for a transparent review with defined timelines and conclusions.

Klaveness states the association will send a letter to FIFA and urge the Ethics Committee to review the complaint.

Reactions emphasize that a complaint from a national association carries weight, especially with UEFA board links, and question Infantino’s ability to maintain good relations with host-country leaders.

The timing is controversial given the 2026 World Cup co-hosted by the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, which adds to the scrutiny of the prize.

The NFF highlights governance concerns and the need for independent processes to prevent political manipulation in prize awards.

Klaveness reiterates, in response to NRK, that the prize is outside FIFA’s mandate and politically charged.