X and Musk Criticized for Holocaust Imagery Justification Amid Antisemitism Inquiry

July 10, 2026
X and Musk Criticized for Holocaust Imagery Justification Amid Antisemitism Inquiry
  • Communications Minister Anika Wells declined to say whether X should be banned, but urged stronger regulation via patchy compliance with Australian law and support for the Digital Duty of Care.

  • The article notes ongoing coverage and directs readers to related topics and updates from the royal commission.

  • LinkedIn’s policy on antisemitism as hate speech was questioned, with executives explaining a June 2025 policy change on strike thresholds did not relate to revenue.

  • CyberWell’s Tala Cohen noted X’s removal rate of antisemitic content fell from 54% in 2024 to just over 29% in 2026, making it the platform with the lowest removal rate among those mentioned.

  • The counsel assisting the antisemitism royal commission condemned X and Elon Musk for using Holocaust imagery to justify allowing graphic Bondi attack footage online, and criticized X for failing to appear before the inquiry.

  • Australia’s royal commission pressed X over displaying graphic Bondi attack images and Holocaust photos to defend keeping the material up, accusing the platform of a shocking disregard for Australians’ safety.

  • Evidence showed Meta, TikTok, and LinkedIn lacked dedicated Australian moderators or offices, raising concerns about enforcement and accountability.

  • Commissioner Virginia Bell said regulating the online ecosystem to curb hate speech and antisemitism is central to the royal commission’s work, focusing on platform accountability.

  • Bell emphasized that tackling online hate is a core objective of the commission’s mandate.

  • Lancaster criticised Telegram, Reddit, OpenAI, Twitch, and Kick for handling antisemitic content, noting some lack Australian-based moderators or a local corporate presence.

  • Dr. Andre Oboler testified that X had been difficult to work with for a decade and had downgraded its trust function after Musk’s takeover, contributing to online antisemitism.

  • Lancaster presented correspondence showing other platforms failed to engage with the inquiry or cooperate sufficiently, and he questioned X’s social license to operate in Australia.

Summary based on 2 sources


Get a daily email with more Tech stories

More Stories