In an editorial reflecting on his visit to Huawei's expansive new research center in Shanghai, Thomas Friedman highlights a significant shift in global technological leadership from the U.S. to China.

The Huawei campus, which spans an area equivalent to 225 football fields and includes 104 uniquely designed buildings, serves as a symbol of China's commitment to innovation and research.

This development is a direct response to U.S. restrictions on technology exports to Huawei, which began in 2019 and significantly impacted the company's operations.

Despite these sanctions, Huawei has rapidly innovated, launching advanced products such as the Mate 60 smartphone and the world's first triple-foldable phone.

In 2024, Huawei installed 100,000 fast chargers for electric vehicles across China, contrasting sharply with the U.S., which had only 214 operational chargers by late 2024 despite a $7.5 billion investment.

Friedman emphasizes the necessity of healthy interdependence between the U.S. and China to navigate the complexities of the global economy, warning of a potential lose-lose scenario if collaboration fails.

He criticizes recent U.S. legislation that restricts Chinese investments, arguing that such measures undermine potential economic benefits and stifle innovation.

Friedman argues that U.S. lawmakers are misinformed if they believe that tariffs alone can restore American manufacturing without addressing the underlying global supply chains.

While the U.S. doubles down on tariffs and undermines its scientific institutions, China is advancing its innovation strategies to reduce reliance on U.S. technology.

Friedman highlights China's investment in STEM education, producing 3.5 million graduates annually, which enhances its competitive edge in technology and manufacturing.

The editorial advocates for a collaborative approach where American and Chinese industries work together, reversing the historical model of 'Made in China' to 'Made in America' with Chinese partnerships.

Friedman warns against the dangers of U.S. lawmakers avoiding engagement with China, as this limits understanding of technological developments critical to future competitiveness.