Demonstrators for and against the Bill have gathered outside Parliament, showcasing the public's divided views on the issue.

The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is currently at its second report stage in the House of Commons, with a potential third reading and vote scheduled for June 20, 2025.

Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who introduced the Bill, expressed confidence in the legislative process, emphasizing the need for a safe and well-regulated piece of legislation that both supporters and opponents can agree upon.

The Bill previously passed its second reading in November 2024 with a majority of 55 votes, but some MPs are now reconsidering their support due to concerns over safeguards and scrutiny.

Leadbeater and MP Munira Wilson advocate for the coexistence of assisted dying and palliative care, emphasizing the importance of providing comprehensive options for terminally ill patients.

Concerns have been raised about the potential harm of social media advertisements promoting assisted dying, particularly for older adults, leading to calls for stricter regulations.

An amendment proposed by Leadbeater aims to regulate advertisements for assisted dying, ensuring that no health or social care professional is compelled to participate in the process.

Dame Rachel de Souza, the Children’s Commissioner for England, has called for children's perspectives to be included in discussions about the Bill, citing fears about potential expansions to include minors.

Concerns regarding an 'anorexia loophole' that might allow individuals with eating disorders to qualify for assisted dying have led to an accepted amendment addressing this issue.

Supporters of assisted dying, including Claire Macdonald from My Death, My Decision, argue that public sentiment favors legislative change to provide choice and compassion for dying individuals.

MPs will have a free vote on the Bill and its amendments, allowing them to act according to personal beliefs rather than party directives.

Disability advocate George Fielding criticized the Bill, arguing it could lead to coercion and societal pressure to choose assisted dying, while supporters emphasize the need to alleviate suffering.