The Labour Party faces backbench anger as the government reverses plans to grant day-one protection from unfair dismissal, instead announcing a six-month qualifying period.

The Trades Union Congress backs the move, stressing the priority of enacting day-one protections (like sick pay) into law and urging continued support from peers to secure Royal Assent quickly.

The change is framed as a compromise to push the Employment Rights Bill through Parliament amid opposition over costs and recruitment.

Key political voices referenced include Labour MPs and union leaders reacting to the climbdown, with some condemning it as a betrayal and others defending it as essential for passage.

The Department for Business and Trade presents the outcome as a compromise reached through dialogue among unions, business, and government, signaling ongoing implementation talks.

Negotiations continue on secondary legislation to address remaining concerns and balance workers’ protections with economic growth.

The update follows discussions with trade unions and business representatives, with officials saying the revised package is workable and will help the bill reach royal assent within its delivery timeline.

Officials cite constructive talks with unions and business as a basis for making the policy more palatable to MPs and ensuring passage toward royal assent.

TUC leadership, led by Paul Nowak, prioritizes getting the legislation onto the statute books, highlighting the tension between campaign pledges and practical passage.

Current law requires a valid reason and fair process to dismiss employees with two consecutive years in a role, creating significant hurdles for termination.

The change is described as a concession to business interests to unblock passage, especially after Lords amendments complicated progress.

Ministers, including Business Secretary Peter Kyle, defend the compromise as a necessary concession to pass the Bill while insisting it does not breach the manifesto.