The bill, which passed with a party-line vote of 68-45, is sponsored by Representative Brenden Jones, who argues it seeks to prioritize qualifications over political favoritism in hiring.

DEI initiatives have gained national attention, with Republican leaders, including former President Donald Trump, actively targeting them across the country.

Democratic leaders, including House Democratic Leader Robert Reives, have expressed concerns that the legislation could hinder government recruitment by labeling qualified candidates as 'DEI hires'.

Despite its passage in the House, the bill's future remains uncertain as Democratic Governor Josh Stein is expected to veto it, and Republicans lack the supermajority needed to easily override such a veto.

Under the new measure, state workers who violate the law could face removal from public office, fines up to $5,000, and potential civil litigation, with compliance audits overseen by the State Auditor.

This legislative effort reflects a broader trend in several states to limit DEI initiatives in public sectors, influenced by national movements against such programs.

The North Carolina House has advanced a bill aimed at restricting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices across state agencies, colleges, local governments, and public schools.

The debate surrounding the bill was marked by interruptions from protesters, with discussions referencing historical context and personal experiences related to DEI.

Jones clarified that the bill does not impact academic instruction or cultural celebrations, asserting that it values diversity while opposing discrimination.

If enacted, the legislation would terminate existing DEI programs unless federally mandated, while still permitting academic classes and student organizations.

Protests occurred during the vote from members of the historically Black Divine Nine fraternities and sororities, highlighting the contentious nature of the legislation.

Jones amended the bill to remove proposed criminal penalties after facing criticism, emphasizing that many corporations are retracting DEI programs due to perceived divisiveness.