Florida Supreme Court Upholds Redistricting, Eliminates Majority-Black District Amid Voting Rights Concerns

July 17, 2025
Florida Supreme Court Upholds Redistricting, Eliminates Majority-Black District Amid Voting Rights Concerns
  • On July 17, 2025, Florida's Supreme Court upheld the state's congressional redistricting map, which eliminated a majority-Black district in North Florida, a decision influenced by Republican Governor Ron DeSantis.

  • Chief Justice Carlos Muñiz stated that a race-predominant district would violate the Constitution's equal protection guarantees, and the court's 5-1 decision rejected challenges from voting rights groups.

  • The ruling maintains the current districts, which favor Republicans with a 20-8 advantage in the upcoming 2026 midterm elections, despite arguments that the map dilutes Black voters' influence.

  • Historically, a Black Democrat has represented District 5 since the early 1990s, but the district's shape and demographics have been contentious, with recent redistricting efforts reducing Black voting power.

  • The eliminated district was previously represented by Black Democrat Al Lawson, but the new map divides that area among three Republican representatives, effectively diminishing Black political influence.

  • Justice Jorge Labarga dissented, arguing that the case should have been remanded to a lower court to allow challengers to propose alternative districts and to better assess the map's compliance with legal standards.

  • The decision has been described as a 'dark day' for voting rights, signaling a potential attack on Black political power and raising concerns about long-term trust in civic institutions.

  • A circuit court initially sided with the plaintiffs, but an appellate court reversed that decision, allowing the current map to stand, despite ongoing disputes and challenges.

  • Plaintiffs had originally requested a ruling on the dismantling of the previous district, which had been represented by Black Democrat Al Lawson, and had agreed to forgo a trial to expedite the case.

  • DeSantis's office previously vetoed attempts to preserve Black voting power in the district, including a map with a significant Black voter population in Jacksonville, favoring Republican gains.

  • The Supreme Court noted that the plaintiffs failed to propose a viable alternative map, which weakened their challenge and contributed to the ruling in favor of the current districts.

  • The majority acknowledged that the new map diminishes Black voters' electoral power but argued that challengers did not demonstrate a viable alternative that met legal standards, a decision seen as a victory for Republicans ahead of the 2026 elections.

Summary based on 11 sources


Get a daily email with more US News stories

More Stories