He also maintained a record of legal actions during Trump's presidency, suing the Biden administration over similar issues and targeting Democratic-led states with investigations into topics such as abortion and voter fraud.

Paxton has requested the Texas Supreme Court to expel 13 Democrats, sought assistance from Illinois courts, and blocked funds for political campaigns, demonstrating his willingness to push legal boundaries for partisan gains.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has been actively using his legal authority to influence political outcomes, particularly supporting Republican interests and opposing Democrats, exemplified by his efforts during the Texas House Democrats' quorum-breaking incident.

During President Biden's administration, Paxton continued to sue the federal government over issues like immigration policies and vaccine mandates, framing these actions as defending Texas' interests against Democratic policies.

Legal experts view Paxton as a figure who pushes the boundaries of his role, using his office to serve partisan goals at the expense of legal and ethical standards, aligning more with Republican interests than constitutional duties.

His aggressive legal strategies have garnered strong conservative support but also alienated Democrats and moderate Republicans, raising concerns about partisan use of the office and potential ethical issues, especially amid personal controversies like his divorce.

Throughout Biden's presidency, Paxton has challenged federal policies, including launching investigations into pharmaceutical companies, healthcare providers, and voting irregularities, emphasizing his strategic use of the attorney general's powers for partisan influence.

Paxton has targeted Democratic-led states like New York for legal actions related to abortion and election integrity, including investigations into voter fraud and noncitizen voting, aligning with Trump-era narratives.

In 2020, Paxton filed a lawsuit against four battleground states over voting procedures, which the Supreme Court dismissed due to lack of standing.

He has a long record of filing lawsuits against federal policies during Obama’s administration, often with limited success, including challenges to the Affordable Care Act and immigration reforms.

His litigation history includes numerous lawsuits against the Obama administration over healthcare, immigration, and environmental policies, as well as a 2020 lawsuit challenging election results in key battleground states, which was dismissed by the Supreme Court.

His tactics are seen as innovative and partisan, potentially pushing constitutional and ethical boundaries, with some experts describing him as exploiting his office to advance political goals.