$175 Billion 'Golden Dome' Missile Defense Faces Criticism Over Feasibility and Cost

August 24, 2025
$175 Billion 'Golden Dome' Missile Defense Faces Criticism Over Feasibility and Cost
  • In February 2025, the U.S. Missile Defense Agency officially renamed the program 'Golden Dome,' possibly due to trademark issues with 'Iron Dome,' adding to the political and financial controversy.

  • The U.S. is developing a missile defense program called 'Golden Dome,' aiming to protect the entire country from long-range missile attacks, with a projected cost of $175 billion by 2029, funded by Congress.

  • Critics describe the 'Golden Dome' as a boondoggle with flimsy origins, exaggerated claims, and questionable technical feasibility, casting doubt on its future.

  • The program is based on an unrealistic comparison to Israel's Iron Dome, which defends against short- and medium-range threats, but is not suitable for the larger, more complex threats faced by the U.S. from Russia and China.

  • The rapidly evolving missile threats, including maneuverability, evasion tactics, and decoys, pose significant challenges to the effectiveness of current and proposed missile defense systems.

  • Even with an 80% success rate in intercepting nuclear missiles, the technical and physical challenges mean the U.S. could still face devastating consequences from missile attacks.

  • The project echoes Reagan’s SDI 'Star Wars' program, which faced similar challenges and was scaled down to focus on more feasible, cost-effective systems targeting shorter-range threats.

  • Initially promoted as 'Iron Dome for America' inspired by Israel's system, the project was championed by Donald Trump during his campaign.

  • Trump claimed the system would cost about $175 billion and be operational in less than three years, but these claims are unrealistic since the technology isn't developed, funding isn't secured, and the timeline is overly optimistic.

  • Lessons from past missile defense efforts emphasize effectiveness, survivability, and cost-efficiency, but critics argue that the current approach overlooks these principles, risking wasteful spending.

  • There are concerns that the defense system could encourage nuclear escalation by emboldening adversaries to believe they can use nuclear weapons without fear of retaliation.

  • Adversaries are also investing in alternative threats like cheap drones and swarms, which could bypass or overwhelm the Golden Dome system, reducing its effectiveness.

Summary based on 2 sources


Get a daily email with more US News stories

More Stories