A bipartisan SACRED Act has been introduced in Congress to create a 100-foot buffer around places of worship and make harassment or intimidation within that zone a federal crime.

The measure is led by Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-NY) and Rep. Max Miller (R-OH) in response to rising antisemitism and confrontational protests at synagogues and other houses of worship.

SACRED would protect individuals exercising their right to worship by prohibiting intimidation, obstruction, or harassment within 100 feet of a religious site, with offenses carrying escalating penalties.

First offenses could bring up to a year in prison and a $10,000 fine, while repeat offenses may reach three years in prison and a $25,000 fine; more serious injuries could trigger up to 10 years in prison.

The bill targets intimidation and obstruction, not lawful protest, and sponsors argue it would withstand constitutional review with input from constitutional experts.

Civil penalties could be pursued by federal prosecutors and state attorneys general, reflecting broad support from civil rights groups.

Endorsements come from a wide coalition including the Anti-Defamation League, American Jewish Committee, Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, Hadassah, Islamic Society of North America, Hindu American Foundation, and others.

Supporters frame the buffer as necessary to deter near-entry harassment and address safety concerns for Hindus, Jews, Muslims, and Sikhs, citing recent threats to religious sites.

Advocacy groups representing diverse faiths argue the bill would deter religiously motivated harassment and safeguard sacred spaces.

A New York City council measure seeks similar protections, signaling broader debate over enforcement, civil liberties, and the balance with First Amendment rights.

Local context on Long Island includes past protests at synagogues and ongoing debates about regulating demonstrations near religious sites while protecting religious freedom and free speech.

City leaders, including NYC Mayor, have expressed support for buffer initiatives but warn against framing all protests as security threats and have vetoed related bills in other contexts.