Aid officials are currently assessing the full impact of these cuts, which have heightened fears of instability in war-torn regions.

Despite assurances from Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other officials that life-saving emergency food programs would be safeguarded, the cuts have raised serious concerns.

WFP chief Cindy McCain emphasized that these cuts threaten global stability and endanger vulnerable populations who rely on aid for survival.

In response to the funding termination, the World Food Program has urgently appealed for the restoration of support, highlighting the critical nature of these programs amid rising global hunger and conflict.

In Syria, approximately $230 million in humanitarian contracts were terminated, including a major program that provided daily food assistance to 1.5 million people.

These funding cuts follow a broader trend of the Trump administration's freeze on foreign assistance, raising alarms about potential unrest in regions such as the al-Hol camp for alleged Islamic State fighters.

State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce confirmed that some contracts for life-saving aid were canceled by error and have since been restored, although specifics on affected countries were not provided.

The cuts are part of a larger pattern of reductions in international aid from the U.S., alarming NGOs and international organizations after previous cuts of 83% to USAID programs.

The Trump administration has made significant cuts to funding for the U.N. World Food Program (WFP), impacting emergency programs that support millions in countries like Afghanistan, Syria, and Yemen.

These recent funding cuts are part of a broader initiative led by Jeremy Lewin, a senior official in the Department of Government Efficiency, aimed at eliminating various USAID programs.

Among the most concerning cancellations is a program that provided education for young Afghan women, forcing them to return to Afghanistan under Taliban rule, where they face significant danger.

The WFP is actively seeking clarification from the U.S. administration regarding these funding decisions, urging them to maintain support for critical programs that address hunger.