U.S. policy shifts under the Trump administration are projected to add roughly 0.1°C to future warming, offsetting some global progress and forcing other nations to tighten reductions.

In 2024, emissions rose by about 2.3%, led by increases in India and then China, Russia, and Indonesia, with the G20 responsible for around 75% of global emissions; the EU was the only major economy to cut emissions.

Ambitious climate action offers health and economic co-benefits, while vulnerabilities in communities and ecosystems to heat and sea-level rise persist.

Every fraction of a degree matters, with risks including tipping points like potential irreversible loss of the West Antarctic ice sheet.

Experts note the fossil fuel industry’s responses to rapid energy transition are evolving as clean energy economics become more viable.

UNEP’s Emissions Gap Report shows the world is on track for about 2.3–2.5°C of warming this century if current plans are fully implemented, underscoring that pledges fall short of Paris goals.

Implementing faster cuts will require navigating geopolitics, substantial support for developing countries, and a redesigned international financial architecture.

ICN’s mission and funding model are explained, highlighting its nonprofit status and commitment to free, independent climate journalism.

Climate action is a national interest, not philanthropy, and immediate deep cuts are the only way to avert extreme events and irreversible damage.

Reductions in temperature are linked to fewer deaths and economic losses, with solar and wind expanding, including gains in Portugal.

The article stresses that action must accelerate to protect livelihoods and avoid irreversible damage.

Proven solutions exist, including rapid deployment of renewables and methane reductions, which could deliver growth, jobs, health gains, and energy security if pursued aggressively.