The latest round of indirect Iran talks in Oman essentially returns negotiations to a starting point on Tehran’s nuclear program, with U.S. officials calling the discussions “very good” and signaling further talks next week.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi signaled Tehran’s willingness to quickly conclude a nuclear agreement, while the talks follow recent U.S. and allied strikes on Iran-related facilities.

The Oman discussions come amid concerns about potential escalation between Iran and the United States, and occur in the broader context of regional tensions.

Israel remains hardline, aiming to dismantle or severely constrain Iran’s nuclear and missile programs, contrasting with a more conciliatory tone from Washington.

Rhetoric between Iran and Israel has heated up, with Araghchi accusing Israel of destabilizing the region and calling for broader sanctions, while Israel insists on ending Iran’s nuclear and ballistic capabilities and its regional support networks.

Analysts note Israel’s stance to be more uncompromising than the United States, which appears open to negotiation opportunities.

Former President Trump has publicly threatened military action over Iran, citing protests and the nuclear program, and the United States has bolstered its Gulf presence.

In parallel, the U.S. has increased its regional military footprint since early January as tensions rise.

The timing of the talks coincides with Washington signaling potential for action and deploying a large naval force to the Gulf in response to protests in Iran and Tehran’s nuclear program.

The diplomatic timing could be awkward for UK Prime Ministerial leadership, as Sir Keir Starmer seeks to navigate key conversations.

The discussions unfold against a backdrop of heightened Middle East tensions, including a June Iranian missile strike on Israel.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio indicated talks should address all core issues, including missiles, regional behavior, and sanctions.