WME publicly backs Lively, framing the dispute as a stand for accountability and the right to speak up, while condemning covert digital smear campaigns.

The court found some cited conduct related to Lively’s character rather than Lively herself and noted that acting within a film context should be considered.

The case has drawn extensive media attention, shaping strategic moves and potentially influencing public narratives and reputations.

Private settlement calls are being used to update and potentially finalize each side’s settlement positions, signaling ongoing negotiations.

Both sides’ ongoing positions and perspectives are laid out as the case moves toward trial on remaining issues.

The article is dated early April 2026 and includes media credits and a prompt for reader reactions.

Public interest centers on accountability for on-set safety and retaliation, with a poll noting whether the case will go to trial or settle.

Multiple document releases, subpoenas, and public statements from both sides—including reactions from industry figures—have marked the case.

Us Weekly obtained the court documents, while representatives have not issued public comments as of the report.

A New York judge dismissed most allegations by Blake Lively against Justin Baldoni, narrowing the case to retaliation, breach of contract, and abetting retaliation, with a jury trial set for May 18.

Entertainment Weekly identifies this as a developing story and promises further updates.