Iran warned against provocative actions before the UNSC vote, noting potential complications from external actions.

The broader dynamic includes ongoing U.S.-Israel actions and Iranian retaliations that shape Security Council deliberations.

US President Trump has made contradictory statements on the Strait, at times downplaying its importance and at other times demanding Iran open it, affecting allied responses.

Diplomatic bargaining surrounds the text as France seeks urgency for a defensive response, while Russia and China push back against legitimizing force and potential escalation.

The United Nations Security Council will vote on a Bahrain-drafted resolution authorizing defensive force to protect shipping through the Strait of Hormuz from Iranian attacks, aiming to secure passage for at least six months.

The resolution seeks to ensure safe transit for vessels through a strategic chokepoint that handles about one-fifth of global oil shipments amid Iranian disruption.

It would authorize member states to use all defensive means necessary and proportionate to deter disruptions to international navigation in the Hormuz Strait.

Oil-price volatility and supply concerns are rising in response to Iranian actions and the reactions of the US, NATO allies, and regional actors.

Some argue the use of force could escalate conflict; China advocates a political settlement, and Russia emphasizes addressing root causes rather than unilateral measures.

The move is backed by the United States and comes amid heightened tensions over energy security and global economic stability.

Iran’s armed forces spokesperson warned the US and Israel of broader, more destructive actions in response to developments around Hormuz.

Russia, China, and France publicly critique the approach, with Russia calling the draft insufficient and urging de-escalation, and China warning against unlawful or indiscriminate force.