The Trump administration declared that the 60‑day war powers clock over U.S.-Iran hostilities has elapsed and framed the conflict as terminated due to a fragile ceasefire, arguing that no further congressional authorization is required.

Iranian state media says negotiation proposals have been sent to the U.S. through Pakistani intermediaries, though skepticism on Capitol Hill remains about the viability of talks.

Democratic lawmakers warn that maritime blockades and similar measures could still be considered hostile actions, underscoring ongoing concerns about war powers and oversight despite the ceasefire.

Public opinion and gas prices are shaping political risk for Republicans as they balance continued support with accountability for the war.

The debate reflects growing opposition and legal scrutiny in Congress and among the public over the war and the administration’s approach.

With voters watching gas prices and broader costs, Republicans face pressure to demonstrate accountability and a clear endgame for the conflict.

The article includes promotional material for Newsmax and cites its reporters and sources for additional context.

Senate Republicans like Todd Young and Susan Collins push for congressional involvement and a defined plan, while others favor executive action and coordination with Congress.

Other brief items touch on endorsements and campaigns in Georgia and Iowa, as well as discussions around conspiracy theories surrounding Trump and the wider political landscape.

Live blog updates guide readers on evolving Middle East dynamics, including shifts in negotiations and regional responses.

Oil market volatility and supply concerns linked to the Strait of Hormuz influence global energy prices amid ongoing maritime security operations.

Overall, the administration seeks ongoing congressional engagement and potential future authorization, while lawmakers remain divided on constitutional and strategic approaches.